Delight at plan decision
Villagers let out a collective cry of delight when councillors refused to give controversial plans for a lodge park the go-ahead.THPD Properties had applied to convert derelict Breckland Garden Centre at Yaxham into 50 holiday cabins, with a campsite and other facilities.
Villagers let out a collective cry of delight when councillors refused to give controversial plans for a lodge park the go-ahead.
THPD Properties had applied to convert derelict Breckland Garden Centre at Yaxham into 50 holiday cabins, with a campsite and other facilities.
Bosses promised the initiative would give the economy a £2m cash injection as well as providing more than 10 local people jobs.
Yet many residents fiercely opposed the scheme on the grounds the development was too big for a small village, the roads would be unable to cope with increased traffic and that plans for recycling water were inadequate.
And on Monday Breckland Council's development control committee refused planning permission for the project citing not enough evidence of environmental protection.
The council received 31 letters of objection and a petition with 126 signatures while Yaxham parish council and Whinburgh and Westfield parish council also opposed.
Most Read
- 1 A47 reopens after serious crash near Swaffham
- 2 Man dies after collapsing during dog walk in Norfolk village
- 3 'Proper farming' sees dairy family crowned Norfolk farm champions
- 4 Why has my car been covered in dust?
- 5 'Being a mum is all she wants' - Fund launched for 26-year-old's IVF dream
- 6 Man charged in connection with burglary at Dereham home
- 7 Customers travelling especially to visit charming new café at fishery
- 8 Care home linked with grandmother's death lifted from special measures
- 9 Final details revealed ahead of Queen's Dragoon Guards freedom parade
- 10 Car driven by Elvis going on display at Armed Forces Day celebration
Phillip Duigan, a member of the development control committee, said: “The status of these properties concerns me.
“They're supposed to be holiday places. People could live here for 11 months of the year, and they're likely to be professional people, who go abroad for a month on holiday. This could be their permanent address. And that is not what the application is for.”
Peter Francis, also a member of the committee, said: “The problem with this application is that many expert reports which we rely on to make a decision haven't come back to us.
“It would be irresponsible of us to make a decision until we know the measures for environmental protection have been taken. Why the application wasn't put in when all the reports were ready I don't know.”
As the councillors unanimously decided to refuse the application, members of the public who had come along to the meeting, clapped and cheered.
