Council won't be investigated over handling of legal agreement
- Credit: Ian Burt
The local government ombudsman will not investigate the handling of a historic legal agreement at a Norfolk council, while a councillor has called for an investigation into their use.
Breckland Council was accused of mishandling a 2013 Section 106 agreement - an agreement between a developer and planning authority to reduce impact by funding local public amenities.
A report by the ombudsman said: “The developers agreed not to allow occupation of a prescribed number of dwellings on the site until they had paid a recreation contribution.
“Mr B told us there is play equipment in the area which would have benefitted from an upgrade.
“Mr B complained that the council failed to invoice the developers for the recreation contribution until two years after they had completed the development.”
You may also want to watch:
Breckland has since admitted “insufficient monitoring” of the legal agreement but said this had now improved.
A Breckland Council spokesperson said: “We are confident that we can effectively monitor local s106 obligations through our dedicated S106 monitoring officer and computer software.
- 1 Customers 'overjoyed' by new rural shop
- 2 'Absolutely fantastic' - Mid-Norfolk pubs enjoy first Saturday back
- 3 BGT star leaves children in 'fits of laughter' with school performance
- 4 'Thank you for everything' - How Norfolk marked Duke of Edinburgh's funeral
- 5 Street light debate councillor says education would stop fear of dark
- 6 'We've got a serious fire in our belly' - Dereham band's post-Covid tour
- 7 Women released under investigation after pub fight
- 8 'It's lovely seeing people back'- Smiles as zoo reopens for families
- 9 9 things that have changed in Dereham since lockdown one
- 10 Vandals smash planters two days after gallery reopens
“Our revised procedures and regular site visits ensure we can identify when payment triggers are reached and we contact developers promptly to release funds.”
Explaining why they would not be investigating Mr B’s complaint, the ombudsman said there was insufficient justification he had “suffered significant enough injustice”.
This is not the first time concerns have been raised about Breckland council’s handling of S106 agreements.
In 2018 the council had to admit they had misinterpreted planning policy which dictates the amount of outdoor playing space required for a development.
This led to councillor Roger Atterwill calling for an internal investigation at a district council meeting on Thursday, February 25.
He said: “This is not the first time in recent history Breckland community has felt, rightly or wrongly, let down by this council’s management of such agreements. Indeed, some have lost important amenities.
“To get Breckland's renewed confidence in our planning system will you commit to undertaking a thorough internal review of the council's S106 process, including outsourcing of such important work?”
Paul Claussen, cabinet member for planning, said he would discuss it with the chairman of the planning committee.